The transformation of Legasov into a daring whistle-blower and martyr, complete with a courtroom apotheosis out of “To Kill a Mockingbird,” is just one instance of the show’s propensity toward Hollywood inflation - to show us things that didn’t happen. ![]() In “Chernobyl,” however, Mazin puts Legasov on the witness stand at the trial and, in a stroke of pure fantasy, has him boldly denounce Soviet corner-cutting and secrecy, after which he’s hauled into a back room by the K.G.B. Legasov recanted before his death, in interviews made possible by the rapid progress of Mikhail Gorbachev’s perestroika. Centrally involved in the response to the disaster, Legasov was mostly a good apparatchik, hewing to the party line that operator error and not flaws in Soviet reactor design led to the explosion. Looking for a tragic hero to center the story on, Mazin has chosen the nuclear physicist Valery Legasov (Jared Harris), in part, perhaps, because his experience with Chernobyl drove him to suicide. ![]() But the scene doesn’t have the force it should, because like much of what has come before, it takes fictional license over the line into contrivance and melodrama. Mazin ends with a potentially clever device: using testimony at the show trial of the plant’s supervisors as a way to circle back and finally recount the story’s beginning, the botched safety test that led to the explosion. It’s a disorienting, compelling sequence - like the operators of the plant, we don’t know what has just happened, and we helplessly follow along as they blunder through the flaming wreckage on fruitless tasks, absorbing tremendous doses of radiation that will kill them within weeks. Mazin, who created the series, begins (after a short prologue) in the moments after the explosion that destroyed the newest of the four reactors at the Chernobyl power station, in what is now Ukraine. And in “Chernobyl,” the writer Craig Mazin (“The Hangover” Parts II and III) and the director Johan Renck take an event unlike any other in human history and turn it into a creaky and conventional, if longer than usual, disaster movie. Of course the techniques of Soviet propaganda bore a lot of similarity to the techniques of Hollywood. But there it is: the imposition of a simple narrative on history, the twisting of events to create one-dimensional heroes and villains, the broad-brush symbolism. This is incongruous, since one of the messages of the program is that Soviet approaches don’t work. “Chernobyl,” a five-part mini-series starting Monday on HBO (in coproduction with the British network Sky), takes what you could call a Soviet approach to telling the tale. But as a story, it’s hard to get your arms around - sprawling and repetitious, dependent on arcane particulars of physics and engineering, marked by failures to act and by large-scale action that accomplishes nothing. I suggest you don't though.How do you dramatize a great big mess? The 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster is a subject full of gripping detail and historical and scientific import. Playing this game is like showing a hot metal spike up your nose: extremely painful, and really stupid. Not even the red flammable barrels littered everywhere explodes. About the only thing they managed to program right. I was going to print screen it, but the developers must have realised that would make people able to see how terrible the game really is, so they somehow disabled that feature. I just killed 30 enemies in one go because they all kept spawning in the same place. The enemy spawns are so bad you can actually see them teleport right in front of you. Why on earth would I need to carry 3 different sniper rifles at the same time?! Oh, and rather having a different sniper rifle for each setting like in Sniper: Manhunter, they just give you all 3 snipers from the beginning for a total of 6 weapons in the entire game. There are tons of them! All with the same gun. I couldn't find a single new thing that they added.Ībout the only "change" is the number of turret sequences. Every single facet from Sniper: Manhunter is copied into this game, be they engine, character models, guns, sounds, music or textures. Yet somehow, this one manages to be worse, even though it's newer. By M4cR1II3n | Review Date: JIf you have played Sniper: Manhunter, you have played this game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |